1.
The documentary filmmakers called this film Hawaiian,
The Legend of Eddie Aikau because the film was based in Hawaii and Eddie was a
native from there. I believe that they
added Hawaiian in the title to add respect towards Eddie being one of the best
if not the best native Hawaiian surfers that could out surf the Australians and
California surfers. Hawaii was very important to Eddie and I believe that in
the documentary the filmmakers wanted this to be clear. I think that adding “The
Legend” in the title also marked a reason such as Eddies heroic actions.
2.
Every documentary has the following elements:
a.
Topic: Eddie Aikau was born and raised in Hawaii and
trained and practiced surfing basically everyday. He was loyal and loving
towards his family and helped many others. He struggled to win a surf contest
on his home ground of Hawaii but later
b.
Focus:
The focus of the documentary was the struggles that Eddie faced. It
focused mainly on the surfing and the struggle to beat white surfers coming to
the island. Not just to beat them but he wanted people to know that the natives
have been surfing for decades.
c.
Angle: The
angle of the documentary changed from this happy surfer trying to be the best,
to a Hawaiian native surfer struggling to gain back confidence and dominance
over other surfers.
3.
Since the film was made by ESPN the filmmakers may
have believed that the audience was more focused on the competition and sport
aspect of film. Most ESPN documentaries include mainly sports related cases not
containing as much detail and historic evidence as the Eddie Aikau film.
4.
The Eddie Aikau film could have been very
different I believe if it was filmed by PBS or the History channel. If done by
the history channel I believe that many other cultural and historical aspects
would be added. If done by PBS I believe that more of a biography would occur
and witnesses and family members wouldn’t be included as much in the actual
film.
No comments:
Post a Comment